Wednesday, March 4, 2015

Climate Justice

Issues of "climate justice" are very relevant to climate geoengineerig. OE

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Climate justice is generally used as a term for viewing climate change as an ethical issue and considering how its causes and effects relate to concepts of justice, particularly environmental justice and social justice. This can mean examining issues such as equalityhuman rightscollective rights and historical responsibility in relation to climate change. Recognizing and addressing the fact that those least responsible for climate change experience its greatest impacts is seen by many as being central to climate justice.[1][2] The term is also used with reference to legal systems, where justice is achieved through application and development of law in the area of climate change.[3]

Definitions of climate justice[edit]

Climate justice is a fluid concept; however, there are recurring themes across definitions. The following definitions taken from 'Organizing Cools The Planet' give a picture of the various understandings of climate justice:[4]
  • Environmental Justice and Climate Change Initiative
Roots in Environmental Justice: “Climate Justice is a vision to dissolve and alleviate the unequal burdens created by climate change. As a form of environmental justice, climate justice is the fair treatment of all people and freedom from discrimination with the creation of policies and projects that address climate change and the systems that create climate change and perpetuate discrimination.[5]
  • Demanding Climate Justice section of Hoodwinked in the Hothouse (published by Rising Tide North America)
Climate Justice as Evaluative Model: “Climate Justice is a struggle over land, forest, water, culture, food sovereignty, collective and social rights; it is a struggle that considers “justice” at the basis of any solution; a struggle that supports climate solutions found in the practices and knowledge of those already fighting to protect and defend their livelihoods and the environment; a struggle that insists on a genuine systematic transformation in order to tackle the real causes of climate change… Climate Justice addresses four key themes: root causes, rights, reparations and participatory democracy.[6]
  • Global Justice Ecology Project
Climate Justice as Global Justice: “The historical responsibility for the vast majority of greenhouse gas emissions lies with the industrialized countries of the Global North. Even though the primary responsibility of the North to reduce emissions has been recognized in the UN Climate Convention, the production and consumption habits of industrialized countries like the United States continue to threaten the survival of humanity and biodiversity globally. It is imperative that the North urgently shifts to a low carbon economy. At the same time, in order to avoid the damaging carbon intensive model of industrialization, countries of the Global South are entitled to resources and technology to make a transition to a low-carbon economy that does not continue to subject them to crushing poverty. Indigenous Peoples, peasant communities, fisherfolk, and especially women in these communities, have been able to live harmoniously and sustainably with the Earth for millennia. They are now not only the most affected by climate change, but also the most affected by its false solutions, such as agrofuels, mega-dams, genetic modification, tree plantations and carbon offset schemes.[7]
  • Indigenous Environmental Network
Four Principles for Climate Justice: "Industrialized society must redefine its relationship with the sacredness of Mother Earth"[8]
  1. Leave Fossil Fuels in the Ground
  2. Demand Real and Effective Solutions
  3. Industrialized – Developed Countries Take Responsibility
  4. Living in a Good Way on Mother Earth

History of the term's use[edit]

  • In 2000, the first Climate Justice Summit took place in the Hague, the Netherlands parallel to the Sixth Conference of the Parties (COP 6) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The Summit's mission stated: “We affirm that climate change is a rights issue. It affects our livelihoods, our health, our children and our natural resources. We will build alliances across states and borders to oppose climate change inducing patterns and advocate for and practice sustainable development”[5]
  • The Durban Group for Climate Justice was formed in 2004 when representatives from organizations and peoples’ movements from around the globe came together in Durban, South Africa to discuss realistic avenues for addressing climate change. The group emerged from the meeting with a call for a global grassroots movement against climate change.[9]

Environmental justice and climate change vulnerability[edit]

Robert Bullard, one of the early environmental justice activist, described environmental justice as the idea that “all people and communities are entitled to equal protection of environmental and public health laws and regulations.”[15] Bullard established that in addition to the physical and natural world, the environment included the spaces where people lived, worked, played, and went to school.[15] According to the book, A Twenty First Century U.S. Policy, and the IPCC 2013 Summary for Policymakers report, climate change will bring about new forms of environmental hazards which are predicted to include increased flooding, water scarcity, and sea-level rise, among others.[16][17]
In A Twenty First Century U.S. Policy, the authors argue that the ability of populations to mitigate and adapt to the negative impacts of climate change are influenced by factors such as income, race, class, gender, capital and political representation among other social factors.[16] According to the same authors and Mohai, P. et al., as a result of the limited adaptive resources that low-income communities and communities of color are likely to have, these populations are particularly vulnerable to the predicted impacts of climate change.[15][16] The authors of A Twenty First Century U.S. Policy, also indicate that low-income people and people of color, who have lower financial stability, less insurance resources, and less access to disaster risk awareness have been least abled to recover from environmental disasters. Additionally these populations have been prone to unequal distributions of disaster relief and recovery assistance.[16] Assessing vulnerability is an important component of defining the level of threat, and the ability to make appropriate decisions concerning climate justice.[18]

Hurricane Katrina case study[edit]

NASA flood image after Hurricane Katrina
According to one study which considered the environmental justice dimensions of climate change, the outcomes of Hurricane Katrina presented insights to outcomes of predicted climate change disasters.[16] According to the authors of the book, A Twenty First Century U.S. Water Policy, the impacts of Hurricane Katrina, which involved the displacement of 400,000 individuals along the United States Gulf Coast, disproportionately affected low-income and minority victims of the disaster.[16] A study looking at the race and class dimensions of Hurricane Katrina suggest that individuals most vulnerable to the disaster included poor, black, brown, elderly, sick, and homeless people.[19]
The book A Twenty First Century U.S. Water Policy argues that a combination of geographic, social and political factors resulted in the disproportionate impact of the hurricane on low-income communities and black communities.[16] For example, low- income communities and black communities had little resources and limited mobility to evacuate before the storm.[20][21] In the aftermath of the hurricane, low- income communities and communities of color in Louisiana were burdened by the hazards of flooding waters that were polluted by contaminated sites and facilities that were located near these communities.[16] Two studies looking at the environmental justice aspects of Hurricane Katrina argue that post disaster, government responses failed to adequately assist the most affected.[15][19] Scholars Elliott, J. and Pais, J. claim that among some of these most impacted included those who had no flooding insurance, those who suffered from low job security, and the low-income homeowners which dealt with mortgage foreclosures.[20][21]
A number of research reports claim that the outcomes of Hurricane Katrina presented opportunities for revealing novel instances and causes of environmental injustices.[16][22] These include the inequitable aspects of city planning and development which result in increased risks of natural disasters and disproportionate impacts on some populations.[15][22]

Groups and organisations[edit]

See also[edit]


  1.  See Kofi A. Annan quote, 1 October 2009 –
  2. Jump up^, climate justice and equity
  3. Jump up^ For example, see Climate Justice Programme
  4. Jump up^ Organizing Cools The Planet
  5. Jump up to:a b Climate Institute, 'Climate Justice Movements'
  6. Jump up^ Hoodwinked in the Hothouse
  7. Jump up^ Global Justice Ecology Project, 'What is Climate Justice?'
  8. Jump up^ For full descriptions of these four principles, see
  9. Jump up^ Durban group for Climate Justice
  10. Jump up^ The Global Humanitarian Forum Annual Meeting 2008
  11. Jump up^ Climate Justice Now statement
  12. Jump up^ Klimaforum declaration
  13. Jump up^ Indymedia article
  14. Jump up^ World People’s Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth, People's Agreement
  15. Jump up to:a b c d e Mohai, Paul; Pellow, David; Roberts, J. Timmons (2009). "Environmental Justice".Annual Review of Environment and Resources 34 (1): 405–430. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-082508-094348.
  16. Jump up to:a b c d e f g h i Christian-Smith, Juliet; al.], Peter H. Gleick ; with Heather Cooley ... [et (2012).A twenty-first century US water policy (Online-Ausg. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.ISBN 9780199859443.
  17. Jump up^ Stocker et al. IPCC, 2013: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  18. Jump up^ Adger, W. Neil., and P. M. Kelly. "Chapter 1." Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Change and Facilitating Adaptation. Norwich: Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, 1999. N. pag. Print.
  19. Jump up to:a b Giroux, Henry A. (2006). "Reading Hurricane Katrina: Race, Class, and the Biopolitics of Disposability". College Literature 33 (3): 171–196. doi:10.1353/lit.2006.0037.
  20. Jump up to:a b Elliott, James R.; Pais, Jeremy (2006). "Race, class, and Hurricane Katrina: Social differences in human responses to disaster". Social Science Research 35 (2): 295–321.doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.02.003.
  21. Jump up to:a b Masozera, Michel (2007). "Distribution of impacts of natural disasters across income groups: A case study of New Orleans". Ecological Economics 63 (2-3): 299–306.doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.013.
  22. Jump up to:a b Kurtz, Hilda E. (2007). "Environmental Justice, Citizen Participation and Hurricane Katrina".Southeastern Geographer 47 (1): 111–113. doi:10.1353/sgo.2007.0007.
  23. Jump up

Further reading[edit]

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Creative Commons License
A #Geoengineering #Climate Issues blog - Geoingeniería by Oscar and Jocelyn Escobar is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.Licencia Creative Commons
A #Geoengineering #Climate Issues blog por Oscar y Jocelyn Escobar se distribuye bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.